Fig. 3 A . The percentage of mutant mtDNA was quantified by dividing the concentration (copies/μl) of high-amplitude FAM-positive droplets by the concentration of HEX-positive droplets. The percentage of WT mtDNA was quantified by dividing the concentration of low-amplitude FAM-positive droplets by the concentration of HEX-positive droplets. C , correlation analysis comparing the three standard methods for heteroplasmy quantification (Sanger sequencing, Psp OMI ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP, and Hae III ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP) to dPCR. The R value comparing dPCR to Sanger sequencing was 0.9938, dPCR to Psp OMI ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP was 0.9924, and dPCR to Hae III ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP was 0.9954. mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; dPCR, digital PCR; RFLP, restriction fragment-length polymorphism. " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry
Article Title: Precise and simultaneous quantification of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy and copy number by digital PCR
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102574
Figure Lengend Snippet: dPCR can be used to quantify heteroplasmy in cellular DNA samples . A , duplex droplet dPCR plots for the mutant mtDNA assay ( top ) and reference mtDNA assay ( bottom ) using various m.3243A > G heteroplasmic cell lines (clones #1–14). The mutant mtDNA assay used a FAM-labeled probe, while the reference mtDNA assay used a HEX-labeled probe. Horizontal lines are drawn to differentiate the distinct droplet populations in the mutant mtDNA assay (high-amplitude positive, low-amplitude positive, and negative) and reference mtDNA assay (positive and negative). The calculated percentage of mutant mtDNA is displayed above each sample. B , heteroplasmy quantification of various m.3243A > G heteroplasmic cell lines using the duplex of the mutant mtDNA assay and reference mtDNA assay shown in Fig. 3 A . The percentage of mutant mtDNA was quantified by dividing the concentration (copies/μl) of high-amplitude FAM-positive droplets by the concentration of HEX-positive droplets. The percentage of WT mtDNA was quantified by dividing the concentration of low-amplitude FAM-positive droplets by the concentration of HEX-positive droplets. C , correlation analysis comparing the three standard methods for heteroplasmy quantification (Sanger sequencing, Psp OMI ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP, and Hae III ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP) to dPCR. The R value comparing dPCR to Sanger sequencing was 0.9938, dPCR to Psp OMI ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP was 0.9924, and dPCR to Hae III ”Last cycle hot” PCR/RFLP was 0.9954. mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; dPCR, digital PCR; RFLP, restriction fragment-length polymorphism.
Article Snippet: Droplets were analyzed using a QX200 droplet reader (Bio-Rad), and QuantaSoft analysis software (Bio-Rad) was used to acquire and analyze data. mtDNA copy number was calculated by multiplying the concentration (copies/μl) of reference mtDNA–positive droplets by the dilution factor (400) and dividing by the concentration of APOC3-positive droplets.
Techniques: Mutagenesis, Clone Assay, Labeling, Concentration Assay, Sequencing, Digital PCR